Saturday, March 4, 2017

A520.8.3.RB - Team Roles


A team can be described as a group of individuals organized to work together to accomplish an objective (Westcott & Duffy, 2014). Teams can also be described as a small number of people with complementary skills who are committed to a common purpose. Teams can also be a group of two or more people who are equally accountable for the accomplishment of a task and specific performance goals.  No matter the definition two main concepts are present.  First multiple personnel, and second working toward the accomplishment of specific goals or tasks.  Within teams there are two main types of goals which exist.  They are task-facilitating roles and relationship building roles (Whetten & Cameron, 2016).  These goals focus on enhancing team performance.  Both types of roles are important however, it is difficult for members of a team to exhibit both types of goals equally.  Team members tend to favor one or the other while participating in team activities.  There are several different roles a task-facilitator can fill.  These roles include: direction giving, information seeking, information giving, elaborating, urging, monitoring, process analyzing, reality testing, enforcing, and summarizing.  These different roles all tend to focus on accomplishment of the mission or objective.  They are the roles which drive a team forward.  Task-facilitators help teams become more efficient and effective.  If a team lacks a task-facilitator they tend to take longer as well as lose focus easily.  The flip side of this is relationship-building roles.  These roles focus on the interpersonal aspects of teamwork.  Personnel who fill these roles tend to help others feel good about themselves as well as others on the team.  They tend to enjoy the work the team is trying to accomplish and create and maintain a tension free environment.  Some of the relationship-building roles include: supporting roles, harmonizing, tension relieving, confronting, energizing, developing, consensus building, and empathizing.  Those who fill these types of roles in a team make the work more enjoyable.  They are humorous and create great chemistry within the team.  These people are attractive (not in a physical sense) to be around and people tend to follow them.  They create a collaborative environment where team members try harder and normally come to consensus easier.  

These two different roles are both equally important to a team accomplishing its mission or goals.  To begin with task-facilitator roles help keep the train moving forward.  If there is nobody on the team who fills these roles then you may never get to your desired outcome.  Whetten and Cameron state that task-facilitator roles are important when your team is slow to progress towards its goal, the team has a hard time staying on task or is deflected easily, when time is a factor and things need to be accomplished by a certain time, when the task is complex or ambiguous, and when everyone seems to be doing their own thing and nobody is moving the team forward (2016).  Relationship building roles are important because of the human factor.  Anytime you have people working together there is the possibility of conflict.  Those who focus on these types of roles have empathy and incorporate humor and support into the team.  They focus on the individual and keep the environment light and positive.

When it comes to me working in a team I think I am pretty balanced and can play both roes well.  Spending the last 17 years of my life in the US Air Force has taught me how to focus on mission accomplishment.  So when the time comes and something needs to be taken care of I know how to get a team of people to focus and get the job done.  On the other side of the coin I enjoy life and like to make things as fun as possible.  So if the stakes are low and there is not a time sensitive situation I can very easily switch to a more relationship role mindset.  As a task oriented person I think I am good at letting the team wander down a rabbit whole long enough to explore some different ideas.  However, when the conversations or ideas start to get way out into left field I can get the group to re-focus and get back on track.  This also goes for sidebars and tangential conversations.  I would love nothing more than to sit around all day and talk sports or politics however, when we are working in a team I highly doubt the end goal is to discuss last night’s game or what the president is up to today. It is very easy for a group to get sidetracked on these types of conversations and it takes a task-facilitator to get everyone back in line with the objectives.  This is a good example of urging type role.  When it comes to my relationship building I love to develop younger Airmen.  When I was an Airman there was nothing I hated more than being told that I did not know the big picture.  Those who were senior felt this answer was good enough when I would ask questions trying to learn why we did things the way we did.  I always told myself if I ever was in a supervisory position where I knew the big picture I would let as many people know as possible.  Because the way I look at this is if I die tomorrow and I am the only one who knows the big picture well than I have just done the US Air Force a huge disservice.  I make it a point to take the most junior person I have on the team and show them exactly why and how we do what we do.  I like to show them the guidance and all the different things they would need to know if they happened to be the only one around and the task needed to be accomplished.

I feel that teams are very important in organizations today.  This is especially true due to the changes in generations within the workforce.  The younger generations are being taught about teamwork and the importance of being in teams.  Schools are now focusing on teamwork and doing group projects.  The need for leaders and managers to be mindful of the importance of teams and teamwork is vital in my opinion to the success or failure of your organization.  

 

Westcott, R. T. & Duffy, G. L. (2014). Team Organization and Purpose. The Journal for Quality and Participation. 37, 3; ProQuest Central.

Whetten, D. A. & Cameron, K. S. (2016). Developing management skills, 9th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment